Resin Waste Workflow Analysis

Basics

Each use of our Wash & Cure unit requires 6000ml (1.5 gallons) of 90%+ IPA to reach the fill line.

IPA costs:

~$16 locally (for now)
$25 online (cheaper may be available)

Each use contaminates the IPA. The more remaining resin, the more contamination. Surface area matters to an extent, but any print area that allows for pooling: "bucket" shapes, dense textures, or other areas where surface tension will make resin more difficult to drain. It's possible for a small mini-fig to contaminate more than a large smooth object.

Support material can also separate during wash, depositing larger chunks of resin in the IPA, along with "particulate" contamination, which presents (in the extreme) as sludgy/colored IPA.

IPA Reclamation

There are processes to clean the IPA, but they are all imperfect, and do not return to the purchased purity levels. e.g. 90% IPA after some amount of use will effectively become more impure, even after fine particle filtering. At a certain point, distillation (💥) is required to achieve high purity levels. As distillation is both dangerous and laborious, OR expensive $$$$ to buy a dedicated solvent reclaiming unit, let's not do it.

I've seen read that many people who think they're filtering their IPA are removing pigment, while leaving the monomers in the IPA. The only real way to check for IPA purity is apparently a specific gravity test. Formlabs has an entire page dedicated to this.

IPA Workflow Options

Assuming a 10-print cycle is tolerable:

Rough particulate filtering

Rough particulate filtering can be done with paint filters.

https://www.harborfreight.com/pack-of-100-60-to-70-mesh-paint-strainers-91376.html

In theory it could just be poured from the wash & cure container, though it might be nice to have something more foolproof and less prone to any sort of accidental spill.

Fine particulate filtering

It's unclear to me if fine particulate filtering matters, as it might be mostly pigment that's being removed.

It could mean a faster path to a print that feels "clean" to the touch, but may still have reduced solvent effect.

Options for fine particulate filtering:

Filtering funnel

https://www.etsy.com/listing/942134536/filtering-funnel-downloadable-stl-file

Offers more surface area for pour.

Decanting via peristaltic pump

Whichever method we choose, we'll need to be transporting 1000s of ml of IPA. If we depend on people lifting buckets, it seems only a matter of time till we have a dramatic spill.

A peristaltic pump will allow for more controlled transfer. Peristaltic pumps have the benefit of being able to have the tubing replaced at low cost.

$85 - 1000ml/min
https://ankoproducts.com/products/a200dx

$27 - 1000ml/min
https://www.foreshinefluid.com/products/bp1000-1000ml-min-12v-24v-oem-peristaltic-pump-long-life

$44 - 3100ml/min
https://www.foreshinefluid.com/products/bp3000-high-flow-peristaltic-pump-3100ml-min

Some McMaster options: https://www.mcmaster.com/products/peristaltic-pumps/flow-rate~less-than~50~gal-day/for-use-with~alcohol-3/for-use-with~isopropyl-alcohol/pump-type~peristaltic/

6000ml cleanout

Future Space use

Leaving containers in back yard... Depending on how laissez-faire we want to be, could be a bucket with a lid with holes drilled in it, set in the corner.

Tent evaporation

IF we have sufficient tent ventilation, along with maybe sealing the tent a bit better, could get away with this. With this amount of intentional tent evaporation, we might want to double check that roasting use doesn't cause resin fumes to enter room.


Revision #1
Created 2026-08-04 13:38:29 EDT by micro
Updated 2026-08-04 13:38:29 EDT by micro